Thursday, May 17, 2012

Gen Con Report

Posted by Ranillon on 16. August 2009 20:08

I am back from Gen Con and as usual I had a good time, although not quite as good as usual.  This is mostly because one of the attractions to such a large convention -- the largest gaming convention in the world -- are all those things I can't do at home.  I mean, if I want to play 40K or Magic: The Gathering (which, actually, I haven't done in years) I can do that at my local shop.  However, I can only take in special seminars and presentations at a place like Gen Con.  Sadly, such events were unusually meager this year.  Basically, if you weren't a writer looking for pointers there wasn't much to choose from (but, if you are, I suspect it was great).  The one good seminar I attended was on skepticism.

However, even if I had gone looking to play Games Workshop games the only example I could find was the above -- a modest Apocalypse game that was offered repeatedly over the course of the convention (but which certainly looked fun).  This is just mind boggling to me -- remember, this is the World's Largest Gaming Convention and the premiere miniatures company and/or its games in the world can barely be found.  Beyond this the only real GW "presence" was two dealers in the dealer's room, The Game Room (from Toledo, I believe) and the Warstore.

What is wrong with this picture?  I understand that Games Workshop has its own Games Days (but, at least this year, no Grand Tournaments), but are you telling me that showing up at Gen Con is somehow prohibitively expensive or that displaying your product in front of an estimated 30,000 people is a bad thing?  The non-attendence of GW goes beyond lost opportunities, but it also ultimately harms its credibility to the average gamer.  True, most of the people there were no doubt more interested in collectable card games or a session of D+D, but not even making an appearance makes Games Workshop seem distant, even perhaps elitest.  And, it's not a matter of GW being an European company as there were a number of those present, including Rackham.

Come on GW -- get a clue and start showing up at the big conventions.

Continuing on with the report proper there was more to see than just people playing Pokemon.  One example is the statue above.  It's the good old Serra Angel from Magic: The Gathering except that in this case she's fifteen feet tall!  I wouldn't want her mad at me!

Another event was the Gen Con painting contest.  The above is an example of one of the best paint jobs submitted -- and, at the same time, an example of how the competition isn't (IMHO) run very well.  That head you're looking at is only a little more than an inch wide, yet the model was entered into the large miniature category.  How did it manage that?  Because the base it's on is five times it's size!  So, it was "large" not because it was a large model, but because it's base was artificially large.  By any reasonable standard the model should have been placed in the "Single Miniature" category.

This may seem like nitpicking, but it's actually fairly important as it gets at the integrity of the competition.  The skills that go into painting an average "off-the-shelf" miniature are subtly different than those that go into painting a large model.  For one thing a large model is far more likely to require extensive work putting it together in a way that looks natural.  It is also more likely to be converted.  Most importantly, its bulk makes the act of painting itself somewhat tricky as you can't just place it on the end of soda pop top and go at it.  You often have to paint it in sections or manhandle it carefully (which is not the oxymoron it sounds like).  Point is that the two size categories are treated differently in competitions for a reason.

For the sake of full disclosure I did indeed enter a figure in this category and did in fact not win anything -- while this model came in 3rd.  It is also telling that the same artist won an award in the "Single Miniatures" category as well.  Accuse me of sour grapes if you like (I thought the top two winners well deserved their awards and that there other deserving models better than mine that didn't win), but issues like this don't make me eager to enter the competition next year.

Of more fun and less controversy was the dealers room which you see above.  Yes, the hall does go back as far as it seems to.  It's always the center of activity and a major reason why I go -- there are usually good deals to be found.  Unfortunately, there were no real good deals on Games Workshop product, but there was plenty of other stuff.  This includes a treasured acquisition of mine, namely new t-shirt from Rich Burlew, the The Order of the Stick guy.

Finally, let me leave you with this picture.  It is one of a tournament being played.  A miniatures tournament, in fact.  Only, it was a tournament for Warmachine/Hordes from Privateer Press.  The event had perhaps sixty people in it.  Likewise, Privateer had a huge booth in the dealers room with demos and even a painting master working his craft who welcomed any and all questions.  Privateer also ran a painting competition that was far more popular and produced far more quality entries than the more generic Gen Con version.

So, again, why is it that Games Workshop can't show up?

Comments (5) -

  • eriochrome

    eriochrome said,

    I think players of the specialists game would note that their was a 1 day blood bowl event at Gencon this year also.  While the game is barely supported by GW currently and the event was run totally independently of GW does not mean it was not there also.


  • AoM

    AoM said,

    Well, let me start with your post about GW's lack of attendance.  GW used to do Gen Con, then they stopped going specifically because they only want GW to have official presence at Games Days.  Yes, there are fan-run events like Adepticon and BoLS Con, but these will not have official booths from GW, just GW games and prizes.  Does it make GW seem elitist?  yes.  Why is this?  Because they are.  No matter how much they might try to be the "family hooby," GW is definitely about profit, and trying to do everything they can to make their official presence only known in situations where there are no other games present.  Most game companies sell their products through the FLGS.  GW opens it's own stores, often times hurting the small FLGS that was supporting not only GW, but other companies in the industry.

    Now, as to your complaints about the competition, the size limits for single figure are clearly stated in the rules for the category, and they also clearly state that the base will come into play, including display bases.  Single figure is 3" x 3" x 3".  I will be entering a 54mm model into single figure next year, as the model, plus the base, only comes to about 2.5-2.75".  Whether it stays in single figure is up to the judges.  

    As I have helped as a competition minion for the past few years, I have been on hand to witness the judging and first cuts in person.  The judges constantly refer to the rules for the category when there is any question as to whether a model needs to change categories, which of the criteria is supposed to count the most for that category, etc.  The competition staff accepting the entries will also tell any entrant that their model has to change categories if it is too large, or will at least give a heads up that it might happen, if the model is close.

    When it comes to entries the caliber of the first cuts at Gen Con, the difference between prepping and painting a large model and a single figure are not as large as you make it seem.  Models are painted unassembled if they aren't single pieces.  The cleaning and preparation of the models, as well as any conversion, is just as intense and laborious.  Yes, there's more to painting a large model, but the preparation and assembly is still about the same.

    I am also speaking as someone who has entered the competition for the past two years.  My entry last year was a bit of a lark just to see what would happen.  This year, I threw in two entries for unit because I had them in my case, didn't need them for the classes I was teaching, and would be able to pick them up in time for an event on Saturday night.  I listened to what people had told me to work on since last year, and I made first cut this year with gaming models.  I'll be bringing some actual competition models next year, and I'm looking for a prize or two.

    If you want to compete at the top level, you've got to put yourself up against the best.  Zack Lanier and Matthieu Fontaine have demons.  They've also got trophies at Gen Con.  Are they better painters than I am?  Sure.  Will I let that stop me from entering, or cause me to bitch about how the competition is judged when the rules are posted months in advance for all to see, as well as right there at the table where you enter your models?  Nope.  It will just make me work on painting better next year.


  • Ranillon

    Ranillon said,

    >GW is definitely about profit, and trying to do everything
    >they can to make their official presence only known in
    >situations where there are no other games present.

    I agree, but the point I was attempting to make (but didn’t state clearly) is that such a policy is counterproductive.  As a profit making entity I would think it would be in GW’s best interest to show itself wherever there is a reason to expect a good return – and what could be better than the world’s largest gaming convention?  If smaller competitors like Privateer and Rackham feel it is beneficial to show up (and do so impressively) how can it not be for GW?  Maybe I am missing something, but as a business strategy this does not make sense to me – and, having a reputation for aloofness and elitism can’t be good for sales.  

    So, GW making an appearance would be a win-win for everyone – GW makes more money and enthusiasts get more and better events.  It also gives more support to those groups attempting to get something going at Gen Con.  As it is GW games have been slowly disappearing at the convention over the last five years – and who can blame gaming groups for not running more events there if the manufacturer itself doesn’t seem to care about Gen Con?

    >Now, as to your complaints about the competition, the size
    >limits for single figure are clearly stated in the rules for the
    >category, and they also clearly state that the base will come
    >into play, including display bases.

    But, the base in this case was a block of wood!  A simple, rectangular block that couldn’t have taken more than a half hour to prepare.  Now, if the block had been extensively carved or worked I would agree with you – the block would clearly be part of the larger model.  However, the block was unprocessed except for being painted black.  In such a case counting it as “part” of the model is to my mind clearly disingenuous even if a technicality within the rules might allow it.

    Think of it this way – it’s the same sort of abuse of the rules as someone trying to balance a dreadnought on a trooper sized base like some metal ballerina just to get away with giving it the advantage of filling “less” space.  It might be technically legal, but would be an obvious violation of the spirit of the game.  

    Now, in this case I am sure that both the artist or the officials didn’t set out to deliberately break rules or produce poor judgments, but that doesn’t make the error any less real.  The model shouldn’t have been in that category – period.

    I realize that at first blush this may sound like random abuse or sour grapes, but I point this out for a very important reason – any competition lives or dies on its reputation.  If that reputation becomes sullied either due to outright corruption or (far more likely) mere bad management the whole thing can become meaningless.  Who wants to enter a contest where the rules are vague or the judgments mysterious?  It doesn’t matter if the people running it are sincere and don’t mean to offend – mess up enough times and no one is going to give them yet another chance.  Right or wrong that’s just the way of things.  After all, other people don’t magically know that the judges are nice people doing their best or that a particular rule was meant to be interpreted in a way not properly defined in the rules.  They just know that something is wrong.

    >If you want to compete at the top level, you've got to
    >put yourself up against the best.

    I have no problem with being beat out by superior efforts – lord knows I have often enough.  But, I want to be beaten honestly, not due to some technicality.  Likewise, I want the rules for the competition to be clear and concise rather than to discover that I was unknowingly penalized due to some vaguely worded rule or even one at best only implied.  Finally, I want to be able to look at the winners and walk away convinced that they deserved their rewards (within a certain reasonable range of personal taste and judgment, of course). If I instead leave in confusion scratching my head over how a certain winner could have possibly beaten out one or more of the other entries (usually not mine) that sure look superior to me then how can I not wonder if something is amiss?

    I personally value knowing that a competition is unbiased over winning.  I will gladly lose every future Gen Con competition from now to doomsday as long as I walk away every time confident that the best paint jobs won.


  • AoM

    AoM said,

    Well, the other reason it is in Large Model and not Single Figure is that Single Figure is exactly that, a single figure.  regardless of what sized block of wood the display base was on, it wasn't a complete figure.  a technicality, but clearly stated in the rules.  All busts go in large model.

    We had a model last year that went from single figure into diorama because of the size of the resin block that the top of the base was carved from.  it looked great, but the rules clearly took the entirety of the base size into account, and it got moved.  still took a prize, though.

    As for the GW stuff, I totally agree with you.  GW is only hurting themselves by their elitist ways and holier than thou attitude.  Sure, there are gamers who only play one game, but there are a lot who play multiple systems.  I think GW could see a big increase in revenue for Specialist Games if they'd bother to get their heads out of their asses long enough to realize that getting a booth at a major convention with tables for Mordheim, Necromunda, Epic, Warmaster, and BFG.  

    Lots of people love Blood Bowl, but they're buying their models from Impact! and other independent retailers.  Sure, Impact has their own Elfball rules, but before they had those rules, they still had all of the models for the different positions for the different races.  Apparently, GW's lust for money can only be satisfied with games that require a minimum investment of $200+ for a starting force and rulebook.


  • gbprime

    gbprime said,

    And I would gladly run that fictional Battlefleet Gothic tournament if we had good prize support for it.

    GW abandons it's secondary games much too quickly.  While I miss the iconic days of Epic scale Titan Legions and games like Man O War and Gorkamorka, Battlefleet Gothic is STILL SELLING.  Why abandon a game that is still marketable?  Why not... market it??

    Ah, the myriad mysteries that are Games Workshop.  =(


Add comment




  Country flag
biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading